SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Protus Oduor Malala v Wanyangu Livingstone Onjala [2020] KEELC 465 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 465 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
465
Citation
[2020] KEELC 465 (KLR)
Decided
25 November 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment of the Honourable T.A. Odera, SPMCoramN.A. MATHEKA
Holding

The respondent is the registered proprietor of L.R. No. North Wanga/Namamali/1598 and obtained title to the land through a lawful succession process. The appellant's appeal is dismissed.

Facts

The appellant and respondent are in dispute over the ownership of land parcel N/Wanga/Namamali/1598. The respondent claims to have obtained title to the land through a succession process, while the appellant disputes this and claims the respondent received a refund of the purchase price.

Issues

  1. Whether the payment to DW3 by the deceased Lawrence Mubatsi Kundu was a refund of the consideration earlier paid by the respondent.
  2. Whether the respondent obtained a title deed to L.R. No. North Wanga/Namamali/1598.
  3. Whether the respondent obtained title to L.R. No. North Wanga/Namamali/1598 illegally.
  4. Whether the respondent established a case for issuance of a permanent injunction against the appellant with regard to L.R. No. North Wanga/Namamali/665.

Reasoning

The court finds that the respondent proved his case on a balance of probabilities and that any subsequent sale of the land was fraudulent. The court also notes that the respondent's title was obtained through a lawful succession process.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with no orders as to costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Mwanasokoni v Kenya Bus Service (1982 - 88) 1 KAR 870
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case