SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Broadlands Kenya Limited v City Council of Nairobi & 6 others [2020] KEELC 511 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 511 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
511
Citation
[2020] KEELC 511 (KLR)
Decided
20 February 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramKLR, KLR. M. Odero
Holding

The court found that the defendants trespassed on the plaintiff's land and ordered a permanent injunction to prevent further encroachment, but did not award general damages for trespass as the plaintiff's claim for a commercial building was not supported by evidence.

Facts

The plaintiff, Broadlands Kenya Limited, claimed that the defendants, including the City Council of Nairobi and six others, trespassed on the plaintiff's land, Parcel No. Nairobi/Block 72/2918, on August 26, 2008. The defendants demolished a perimeter fence and other structures on the property and removed the plaintiff's movable properties. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants intended to clear the land for an Econet Wireless Kenya Limited Mast, claiming it was public land.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendants encroached on the plaintiff’s land
  2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs sought
  3. Who should bear costs

Reasoning

The court acknowledged the plaintiff's ownership of the land and the defendants' trespass, but ruled against the plaintiff on the claim for general damages due to lack of evidence supporting the intended commercial building.

Outcome

The court upheld the injunction but did not grant general damages.

Orders

  • A permanent order of injunction restraining the defendants from further encroaching on the plaintiff's property

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Nakuru Industries Ltd vs S S Mehta & Sons (2016) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case