SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joseph Nyaga Mwikamba v County Government of Tharaka Nithi [2020] KEELC 628 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 628 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
628
Citation
[2020] KEELC 628 (KLR)
Decided
18 November 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedingsCoramAnn Wahome
Holding

The court grants leave to the applicant to commence judicial review proceedings.

Facts

The applicant, Joseph Nyaga Mwikamba, seeks leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the decision of the District Commissioner, dated July 6, 2017, which held that the respondent, County Government of Tharaka Nithi, is the beneficial owner of Land Parcel No. 2375. The applicant claims the land is his ancestral land.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has provided a valid reason for the delay in filing the judicial review proceedings.
  2. Whether the applicant's case is merited and if the decision of the District Commissioner is unlawful and should be quashed.

Reasoning

The court considers the applicant's reasons for the delay and the constitutional provisions, concluding that the applicant has provided compelling reasons and that the strict application of the law would prejudice the fair administration of justice.

Outcome

Leave granted

Orders

  • Grant leave to commence judicial review proceedings

Remedies

  • None specified

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Fair Administrative Action Act 2015
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • Republic v Public Procurement Administration Review Board ex parte Syner Chemie
  • Republic v Kenya Revenue Authority Ex-Parte Stanley Mombo Amuti
  • Telkom Kenya Limited v John Ochanda
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case