SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanjiru Thuku & another v David Ngigi Kigamba & 2 others [2020] KEELC 836 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 836 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
836
Citation
[2020] KEELC 836 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramL. GACHERU
Holding

The Plaintiffs failed to prove their case on the required standard of balance of probability, and the Amended Plaint is dismissed. The 3rd Defendant's claim is found to be merited and allowed.

Facts

The Plaintiffs are the legal representatives of David Thuku, deceased, and claimants to land titled Kiambu/Munyu 924. The 3rd Defendant, Stanley Kiwiri Gachuru, claimed a portion of the land.

Issues

  1. Fraudulent acquisition of land
  2. Trespassing on land
  3. Eviction of the 3rd Defendant

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove fraudulent acquisition and trespassing.

Outcome

The Amended Plaint is dismissed. The 3rd Defendant's claim is allowed.

Orders

  • Eviction to be carried out only upon confirmation of Plaintiff's occupancy and upon giving the necessary Eviction Notice as provided by section 152 E of the Land Act

Remedies

  • Eviction of the 3rd Defendant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case