SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Communist Party of Kenya v Nairobi Metropolitan Services & 3 others; National Environment Management Authority & another (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 125 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 125 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
125
Citation
[2021] KEELC 125 (KLR)
Decided
30 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConservatory Order ReviewPostureApplication for review of conservatory orderCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The court found that the application was filed timeously and that a review order should be granted only in exceptional circumstances.

Facts

The Communist Party of Kenya petitioned the court to restrain Nairobi Metropolitan Services and others from carrying out renovations, cutting down trees, and works on Uhuru Park pending the hearing and determination of the petition.

Issues

  1. Whether the court should proceed to set aside the proceedings of 6th December 2021 and its subsequent ruling and/or conservatory orders issued on 7th December 2021

Reasoning

The court applied Civil Procedure Rules and Mutunga Rules to determine the jurisdiction to review its own orders. It held that a review order should be granted only in exceptional circumstances, such as discovery of new and important matter or evidence, or a mistake or error apparent on the face of the record.

Outcome

The court denied the application to set aside the proceedings and orders.

Orders

  • The court denied the application to set aside the proceedings and orders

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Practice and Procedure Rules 2013
Cases cited (2)
  • Benjoh Amalgamated Ltd vs Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
  • National Bank of Kenya Limited v Ndungu Njau
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case