SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v National Land Commission & 2 others; Mukonyoro & 3 others (Interested Parties); Wangai & 4 others (Exparte) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E6 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 12574 (KLR) (27 September 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 12574 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
12574
Citation
[2022] KEELC 12574 (KLR)
Decided
27 September 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for leave to apply for judicial review order of certiorari & prohibitionCoramJ M MUTUNGI
The exparte applicants' application is dismissed as they failed to demonstrate a valid PDP No. R23/98/7.

Facts

Two Part Development Plans (PDPs) were issued over a parcel of land within Njoro subcounty in Nakuru County. The exparte applicants claim PDP No. R23/98/7 was validly issued, while the Republic and National Land Commission contest its validity.

Issues

  • Validity of PDP No. R23/98/7
  • Right to re-allocate land plots

Reasoning

The court found the exparte applicants did not demonstrate a valid PDP No. R23/98/7, and the impugned PDP No. R23/2001/3 was issued properly under the Physical Planning Act.

Outcome

The exparte applicants' Notice of Motion dated 16th July 2021 is ordered dismissed.

Orders

  • The costs of the application are to be borne by the interested party

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Physical Planning Act, Cap 286 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Nakuru HC Misc Application No.201 of 2008
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case