Symphosia Consult Limited v Kaburu & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 256 of 2017) [2022] KEELC 13 (KLR) (28 April 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 13
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 13 (KLR)
- Decided
- 28 April 2022
Summary at a glance
The application is dismissed with costs
Facts
Symphosia Consult Limited bought a parcel of land in the early 1990s, but in 2010 discovered it had been unlawfully transferred to George Gikere Kaburu. The plaintiff sought to review the previous judgment.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders of review
- Whether the plaintiff's counsel's capacity to represent the plaintiff after judgment is valid
Reasoning
The plaintiff's application for review is dismissed as it clearly offends Order 45 rule (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The plaintiff's application for change of counsel is also dismissed as it goes to the root of the case and is not opposed.
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…