SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

United Kenya Limited v Mereu & 5 others (Environment & Land Case 959 of 2017) [2022] KEELC 13261 (KLR) (3 October 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 13261 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
13261
Citation
[2022] KEELC 13261 (KLR)
Decided
3 October 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramMN GICHERU
Holding

The Plaintiffs are the registered proprietors of the suit land and are entitled to the rights of proprietors under Sections 24 and 25 of the Land Registration Act. The Defendants do not have lawful justification for occupying the land. The Plaintiffs are entitled to prayers (a), (b), and (d) in the plaint amended on 30th April, 2018.

Facts

United Kenya Limited and Magadi Solar Plant Limited filed a suit against John Lamison Ole Mereu, Rukiya Ene Lamison, Ngayami Ole Mereu, Nankoya Ene Ngayami, Leketuk Ole Simpala, and Resiato Ene Lekutuk for trespass, wastage, and destruction of their property. The suit was filed after the defendants illegally occupied the land and refused to vacate it.

Issues

  1. Are the Plaintiffs the registered proprietors of the suit land?
  2. Are the Plaintiffs entitled to the rights of proprietors under Sections 24 and 25 of the Land Registration Act?
  3. Do the Defendants have any lawful justification for occupying the Plaintiffs' land?
  4. Are the Plaintiffs entitled to the orders sought?

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiffs are the registered proprietors of the land and are entitled to the rights of proprietors under the Land Registration Act. The Defendants do not have lawful justification for occupying the land. The Plaintiffs are entitled to the orders sought.

Outcome

Judgment for the Plaintiffs against the Defendants as prayed for in paragraph 22 (a), (b), and (d) of the plaint amended on 30th April, 2018.

Orders

  • An order against the Defendants by themselves, their livestock, servants, agents, employees and/or person claiming under them to vacate the Plaintiffs’ property L.R. Kajiado/Loodariak/638, suit land.
  • An order that the Defendants and anybody claiming through them to demolish all their temporary residential structures, their livestock pens and all other structures that they have put up on the suit land.
  • General damages for trespass, wastage and destruction as per paragraph 22 in the plaint amended on 30th April, 2018.
  • Costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Vacation of the Defendants from the suit land.
  • Demolition of temporary residential structures, livestock pens, and other structures.
  • General damages for trespass, wastage, and destruction.
  • Costs of the suit.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Registration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case