SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Solian Investment Limited v KSC International Limited in Receivership (Formerly known as Kundan Singh Construction Limited) & 5 others (Environment & Land Case 22 of 2016) [2022] KEELC 13548 (KLR) (19 October 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 13548 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
13548
Citation
[2022] KEELC 13548 (KLR)
Decided
19 October 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJO OLOLA
Holding

The court found that the defendant's creation of title No Mtondia/Roka/11 was illegal and that the plaintiff's title to title No 15351 is null and void.

Facts

Solian Investment Limited (plaintiff) claims that KSC International Limited in Receivership (defendant) illegally created a new land parcel (title No Mtondia/Roka/11) that engulfs and subsumes their existing land (title No 15351, CR 22091). The defendant claims it purchased the land as an innocent purchaser for value without notice of defects.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant's creation of title No Mtondia/Roka/11 was illegal and whether the plaintiff's title to title No 15351 is null and void.
  2. Whether the defendant acquired a lawful title to title No Mtondia/Roka/11.

Reasoning

The court determined that the defendant's creation of title No Mtondia/Roka/11 was illegal and that the plaintiff's title to title No 15351 is null and void due to the irregular creation and amendment of the registry index map.

Outcome

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims.

Orders

  • The court declared that the defendant's creation of title No Mtondia/Roka/11 was illegal and that the plaintiff's title to title No 15351 is null and void.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case