SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization v Attorney General & 3 others (Environment & Land Petition 1012 of 2013) [2022] KEELC 13587 (KLR) (12 October 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 13587 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
13587
Citation
[2022] KEELC 13587 (KLR)
Decided
12 October 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetitionPostureAppeal from a previous dismissal of the petitionCoramSO OKONG'O
The court found no error of principle in the taxing officer's assessment and dismissed the application.

Facts

The Petitioner, Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, brought a petition against the Respondents (Attorney General, National Land Commission, and two private entities) claiming that the suit properties (L.R No. Naivasha Block 5 Parcels 230-233) were illegally converted from public to private land and sought declarations, injunctions, and orders for possession.

Issues

  • Whether the taxing officer erred in principle in assessing the instruction fees and getting up fees payable to the 3rd Respondent

Reasoning

The court applied established principles regarding the taxation of costs, stating that a judge should not interfere with the taxing officer's discretion unless it is shown that the officer erred in principle or the fee awarded was manifestly excessive.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Nyangito & Co. Advocates v Doinyo Lessos Creameries Ltd.
  • Visser v Gubb
  • KTK Advocates v Baringo County Government
  • Republic v Kenyatta University & Another Ex parte Wellington Kihato Wamburu
  • Bank of Uganda v Banco Arabe Espanol
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case