SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Riunga v Director General, National Environment Management Authority & another (Appeal E057 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 15564 (KLR) (20 December 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 15564 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
15564
Citation
[2022] KEELC 15564 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the decision of the National Environment TribunalCoramEK WABWOTO
The Appeal is allowed and the ruling delivered on 25th July 2022 is hereby set aside.

Facts

The Appellant, Susan Wanjiku Riunga, appealed against the decision of the National Environment Tribunal which upheld the Preliminary Objections of the 1st and 2nd Respondents and dismissed the Appellant's appeal with costs.

Issues

  • Tribunal erred in not determining the issue before it under the application dated 2nd June 2022.
  • Tribunal erred in determining a matter not pleaded in the application.
  • Tribunal erred in allowing Preliminary Objections which were not founded.
  • Tribunal erred in dismissing an appeal that had not been filed and without interrogating the issue of leave to appeal out of time.
  • Tribunal erred in not considering the Appellant's written submissions.
  • Tribunal erred in escalating the proceedings commenced by the Notice of Motion dated 2nd June 2022 as a substantive Appeal.
  • Tribunal erred in dismissing the Appeal without rendering a decision on the substance thereof.

Reasoning

The Appellant appealed against the Tribunal's decision on various grounds, including procedural errors and failure to consider the Appellant's submissions.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Tribunal is directed to consider the Application dated 2nd June 2022.
  • Each party to bear own costs of the Appeal.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case