SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nortis Investments Limited & another v Mary Abondo Achungo & 3 others [2022] KEELC 1781 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1781 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1781
Citation
[2022] KEELC 1781 (KLR)
Decided
27 January 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramNot explicitly named in the text, but implied to be the presiding judge(s)
Holding

The court found that the registration of the suit property in the name of Phenny Holdings Limited as a nominee of the Achungos was not erroneous and that the plaintiffs are not entitled to the reliefs sought in the plaint.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Nortis Investments Limited and Phenny Holdings Limited, brought a suit against the defendants, Mary Abondo Achungo and others, seeking damages for fraud and deceit, a permanent injunction, and rectification of the title for the suit property. The suit property, L.R No. 209/9680, was originally owned by the Achungos, who sold it to the plaintiffs through an agreement dated July 24, 2002. The plaintiffs claim the title was incorrectly registered in the name of Phenny Holdings Limited as a nominee of the Achungos.

Issues

  1. Whether the registration of the suit property in the name of Phenny Holdings Limited as a nominee of the Achungos was erroneous.
  2. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the reliefs sought in the plaint.

Reasoning

The court determined that the plaintiffs had no evidence linking Phenny Holdings Limited to the agreement of sale between the plaintiffs and the Achungos, and that the agreement did not mention a nominee.

Outcome

The appeal was dismissed.

Orders

  • The plaintiffs' claims for damages for fraud and deceit, a permanent injunction, and rectification of the title were dismissed.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case