SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wilson Kimtai & 3 others v Jane Nkatha Kithinji (Suing as legal representative of the estate of Japhet Ktihinji Mwirebua – Deceased) & 5 others [2022] KEELC 1970 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1970 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1970
Citation
[2022] KEELC 1970 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a High Court order dismissing an appeal and setting a deadline for prosecution of the appealCoramHON. C.K. NZILI, Kiruai, Kaume
The application is dismissed with costs as the delay in filing the application is not sufficient cause for the court to restore the appeal for hearing.

Facts

The appellants filed an appeal against a High Court order dismissing their case. The appeal was dismissed twice previously, and the appellants filed and were allowed two applications for extension of time. The appellants now seek to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the appellants have shown sufficient cause to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the appeal
  • Whether the court has the power to extend the time for prosecution of the appeal

Reasoning

The court dismissed the application, stating that the appellants' delay in filing the application was not sufficient cause and that the court had been aware of the appellants' duty to file the application during the High Court vacation.

Outcome

The application is dismissed.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case