Sundia v Akello & 3 others (Environment & Land Petition 03 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 2827 (KLR) (29 June 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 2827
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 2827 (KLR)
- Decided
- 29 June 2022
Summary at a glance
TypeLand PetitionPostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramBN OLAO, Kaniaru, Omollo
The Petitioner's application for a temporary injunction is granted, and the 1st Respondent is ordered to refrain from interfering with the Petitioner's possession and use of the suit land. The Petitioner is also ordered to ensure that the Petition is heard and determined within 12 months from the date of this ruling.
Facts
The Petitioner, Gabriel Onyachi Sundia, is the Administrator of the Estates of deceased individuals who jointly owned land parcel No Samia (luanda/Muoma – 1369). The 1st Respondent, Francis Tobias Akello, is the Land Registrar who merged the suit land with parcel No Samia/Luanda/Mudoma – 693, creating land parcel NO Samia/Luanda/Mudoma – 3572.
Issues
- Petitioner's claim that his fundamental rights were violated when the suit land was merged with parcel No Samia/Luanda/Mudoma – 693
- Petitioner's request for a conservatory order to prevent the 1st Respondent from interfering with his possession and use of the suit land
- Petitioner's request for a temporary injunction pending trial
Reasoning
The court finds that the Petitioner has established a prima facie case and that he and his family will suffer irreparable loss if the order of temporary injunction pending trial is not issued. The court also considers the balance of convenience in favour of the Petitioner.
Outcome
The Petitioner's application for a temporary injunction is granted.
Orders
- Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Petition, an order of injunction is issued injuncting the 1st Respondent his agents, servants or any persons acting under his instructions from interfering with the Petitioner’s peaceful possession and use of the land parcel No Samia/Luanda – Mudoma/1369.
- Costs of the application shall be in the Petition.
- The Petitioner shall ensure that this Petition is heard and determined within the next twelve (12) months from the date of this ruling otherwise the injunction shall lapse unless the Court extends it for sufficient reasons.
Remedies
- Temporary injunction pending trial
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…