SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Oimba v Aoko & another (Environment and Land Appeal 17 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 29 (KLR) (28 February 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 29 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
29
Citation
[2022] KEELC 29 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the trial courtCoramGMA ONGONDO
Holding

The appeal is dismissed, and the judgment of the trial court is upheld.

Facts

The plaintiff, Lucas Ogolla Oimba, is seeking an injunction against the defendants, Rose Aoko and Jared Otieno Ouma, over land reference number Kabuoch/Kachieng/1704. The defendants deny the jurisdiction of the trial court over the dispute.

Issues

  1. The degree of proof required in a civil suit is on a balance of probability, not beyond reasonable doubt.
  2. The trial court failed to properly analyze the conflict between the parties without a proper adjudication of the issue.
  3. The trial court erred in considering the evidence of the land office report and the respondents' own evidence regarding the sale of land.

Reasoning

The court found that the trial court's reasoning was correct and in consonance with the law. The appeal was dismissed as it was untenable.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed
  • No order as to costs in this appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Registered Land Act (now repealed)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Land and Environment Act, 2011
Cases cited (3)
  • Dr Joseph Arap Ngok-vs-Justice Moijo Ole Keuwa and 5 others (1997) eKLR
  • Amosam Builders Developers Ltd-vs-Gachie and 2 others (2009) KLR 628
  • Registered Trustees Legio Maria Africa Church Mission-vs Simeon Nyamweya Obwocha (2018) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case