SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muriria v Syokimau Farm Limited & another; Mang’eli & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 423 of 2012) [2022] KEELC 3022 (KLR) (20 June 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELC 3022 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3022
Citation
[2022] KEELC 3022 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous order dismissing the suitCoramCA OCHIENG, Franklin, KLR Mativo
Holding

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to set aside the order dismissing his suit.

Facts

The plaintiff, Muriria, filed a notice of motion application to set aside an order dismissing his suit. The 1st and 2nd defendants, Syokimau Farm Limited and Gilbert Magera Noru, opposed the application, claiming the plaintiff was indolent and had not provided sufficient grounds for review.

Issues

  1. Whether the court can review and set aside the impugned order dismissing the plaintiff's suit
  2. Whether the plaintiff's absence from the hearing was due to a sufficient cause

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff's absence from the hearing was due to his own lack of diligence and interest in the matter, and not due to a sufficient cause as defined by the court.

Outcome

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application.

Orders

  • The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to set aside the order dismissing his suit.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • Benjoh Amalgamated Limited & Another Vs Kenya Commercial Bank Limited (2014) eKLR
  • Shah V Mbogo (1968) EA 93
  • Mwangi S Kenyi Vs Attorney General & Another Civil Suit Misc. 720 of 2009
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case