SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Dabo v Noor & 6 others (Environment & Land Case 010 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 3103 (KLR) (13 June 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELC 3103 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3103
Citation
[2022] KEELC 3103 (KLR)
Decided
13 June 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous rulingCoramPM NJOROGE
Holding

The court grants a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from entering, trespassing, and interfering with the land parcel. The plaintiff is allowed to serve the defendants by substituted service, and the plaintiff is awarded costs for the application.

Facts

Diba Hussein Dabo claimed ownership of land parcel Isiolo Township Block 1/159, which he purchased in 2013. In 2019, defendants trespassed onto the land and began claiming ownership. Dabo reported the defendants to the CID, and they were charged with forcible detainer. Despite the charges, the defendants continued to trespass and sell portions of the land.

Issues

  1. Ownership of the land parcel Isiolo Township Block 1/159
  2. Temporary injunction to prevent trespassing and interference with the land

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff is the legally registered owner of the land and has a prima facie case with high chances of success. The defendants' actions violated the plaintiff's right to private property under the Constitution of Kenya 2010.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • Granting a temporary injunction to prevent trespassing and interference with the land parcel
  • Allowing the plaintiff to serve the defendants by substituted service
  • Awarding costs to the plaintiff

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction to prevent trespassing and interference with the land parcel

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case