SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

U-Haul Vehicle Ltd v Kiambu Dandora Farmers Co. Ltd & 5 others (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 39 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 3108 (KLR) (27 June 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELC 3108 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3108
Citation
[2022] KEELC 3108 (KLR)
Decided
27 June 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterlocutory ApplicationPostureAppeal from original trial outcomeCoramSO OKONG'O
Holding

The court found that the OCS failed to comply with the order of November 26, 2020, and ordered the OCS to provide security to the plaintiff.

Facts

The plaintiff, U-Haul Vehicle Ltd, filed an interlocutory application seeking a temporary injunction against the 1st defendant, Kiambu Dandora Farmers Co. Ltd, to prevent interference with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of land parcels LR No 209/9466 and LR No 209/9467. The court issued an order on November 26, 2020, requiring the OCS to provide security to the plaintiff in case of further demolition of structures on the suit properties.

Issues

  1. Whether the OCS disobeyed the court order of November 26, 2020

Reasoning

The court considered the evidence and held that the OCS did not provide security as required by the court order, despite being aware of the order and its terms.

Outcome

OCS ordered to provide security to the plaintiff

Orders

  • Ordering the OCS to provide security to the plaintiff

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • National Police Service Act, 2011
Cases cited (4)
  • Hadkison v Hadkinson (1952) All ER 567
  • Mwangi HC Wangondu v Nairobi City Commission (1998) Civil Appeal No 95
  • Mutitika v Baharini Farm Ltd (1985) KLR 227
  • Basil Criticos v Attorney General & 4 others (2012) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case