SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Demeure Cloud Nine Limited v Nairobi City County Government (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 285 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 3400 (KLR) (27 July 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEELC 3400 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3400
Citation
[2022] KEELC 3400 (KLR)
Decided
27 July 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAmendment of PleadingPostureApplication for leave to amend pleadingsCoramSO OKONG'O
Holding

The application for leave to amend the plaintiff's pleadings is allowed

Facts

Demeure Cloud Nine Limited filed a suit against Nairobi City County Government to restrain the latter from interfering with its approved development on LR No 1/854. The plaintiff claimed pecuniary losses due to the defendant's actions and sought to introduce new claims for special damages.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's application for leave to amend its pleadings should be granted
  2. Whether the proposed amendment would prejudice the defendant or cause injustice

Reasoning

The court found that the amendment is necessary for the determination of real questions in controversy and will not prejudice the defendant or cause injustice.

Outcome

The application is allowed

Orders

  • The plaintiff is granted leave to amend its plaint in terms of the draft amended plaint annexed to the affidavit in support of the application
  • The amended plaint shall be filed within 14 days from the date of the ruling
  • The defendant shall be at liberty to amend its defence within 14 days of service of the amended plaint
  • The plaintiff shall be at liberty to file a reply to the amended defence if any within 7 days of service
  • The costs of the application shall be in the cause
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case