SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wandemi Developers Limited v National Land Commission & another; Varsityville Residents Association (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Petition 29 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 3920 (KLR) (28 July 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELC 3920 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3920
Citation
[2022] KEELC 3920 (KLR)
Decided
28 July 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetition for Judicial ReviewPosturePetitioner seeks a declaration, judicial review order, prohibition, injunction, and costs.CoramOA ANGOTE
The court held that the National Land Commission's decision to revoke the petitioner's title was made without affording an opportunity to be heard, thus violating the petitioner's rights to a fair hearing and fair administrative action.

Facts

Wandemi Developers Limited bought land known as Ruiru/Ruiru East Block 7/46. The National Land Commission recommended revoking the petitioner's title, which was communicated through a gazette notice.

Issues

  • Whether the National Land Commission's decision to revoke the petitioner's title was made without affording an opportunity to be heard, thus violating the petitioner's rights to a fair hearing, fair administrative action, and property.
  • Whether the petitioner's rights to a fair hearing and fair administrative action were violated in the revocation of the title.

Reasoning

The court found that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to be heard, which violated their rights to a fair hearing and fair administrative action as guaranteed by Article 40 and Article 47 of the Constitution.

Outcome

The court declared the proceedings and decision of the National Land Commission as contravening the petitioner's rights and ordered the quashing of the decision.

Orders

  • Judicial review order of certiorari to remove to the High Court and quash the decision of the 1st respondent contained in legal notice 6865 table 13 item 18.
  • Judicial review order of prohibition to prohibit the 2nd respondent from revoking the petitioner's title on LR number Ruiru/Ruiru East Block 7/46 or mandamus to restore the petitioner's title if the decision of this court after revocation is effected.
  • An injunction to restrain the interested parties from entering, encroaching or trespassing or in any other way interfering with the petitioner's quiet possession of the aforementioned suit land.

Remedies

  • Judicial review order of certiorari to remove to the High Court and quash the decision of the 1st respondent contained in legal notice 6865 table 13 item 18.
  • Judicial review order of prohibition to prohibit the 2nd respondent from revoking the petitioner's title on LR number Ruiru/Ruiru East Block 7/46 or mandamus to restore the petitioner's title if the decision of this court after revocation is effected.
  • An injunction to restrain the interested parties from entering, encroaching or trespassing or in any other way interfering with the petitioner's quiet possession of the aforementioned suit land.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • National Land Commission Act, 2012
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Judicial Service Commission v Mbalu Mutava & Another [2015] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case