Republi v Deputy County Commissioner Baringo Central & 5 others Ex parte Gideon Kandagor & another; Charles Kigen (Interested Party) [2022] KEELC 852 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 852
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 852 (KLR)
- Decided
- 16 March 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramONIALA, S.M.KIBUNJA
Holding
The court finds merit in the Interested Party's preliminary objection and dismisses the application for judicial review.
Facts
The case involves an application for judicial review by Gideon Kandagor and Philemon Kandagor against the Deputy County Commissioner of Baringo Central and five others.
Issues
- Whether the application for judicial review was timely
- Whether the court requires leave to apply for judicial review
Reasoning
The court reiterates the need to restate the position of the Rule as per Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015, and Environment and Land Court Act 2011. It also states that the application was not timely due to the need for leave.
Outcome
Dismissed
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution
- Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015
- Environment and Land Court Act 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…