Republic v Deputy County Commissioner, Buuri East Sub-County & another; Tirindi (Exparte Applicant); M’Ringera (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E010 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 16201 (KLR) (8 March 2023) (Ruling)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 16201
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 16201 (KLR)
- Decided
- 8 March 2023
Summary at a glance
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for leave to file a substantive notice of motionCoramCK NZILI
The application is granted, and the applicant is granted leave to file a substantive notice of motion.
Facts
The applicant was unable to file a substantive motion due to illness and office closures during December 2022. The applicant has since provided medical reports and security for costs.
Issues
- Whether the application for leave to file a substantive notice of motion should be granted
- Whether the orders should be set aside, varied, reviewed, or discharged
Reasoning
The court finds that the application has been filed without undue delay and that the applicant has provided security for costs, thus no irreparable harm would be caused. The court also notes that the medical reports are dated before 2022 and the letter does not cover the period of December 2022.
Outcome
The application is granted.
Orders
- Leave granted to file a substantive notice of motion
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…