SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Town Clerk, Municipal Council of Mombasa; Chogo & 3 others (Exparte Applicants); African University Trust of Kenya (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Application 103 of 2012) [2023] KEELC 16436 (KLR) (21 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 16436 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
16436
Citation
[2023] KEELC 16436 (KLR)
Decided
21 March 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent's Taxation Ruling Set Aside and RemittedCoramN.A. MATHEKA
The Taxing Master used the wrong principles on the issue of VAT and getting up fees, and the application is merited.

Facts

The applicants sought to have a Taxation Ruling and a Party & Party Bill of Costs set aside or varied, arguing that the Taxing Master erred in applying the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2009.

Issues

  • Taxation Ruling Set Aside
  • Party & Party Bill of Costs Remitted
  • Costs to Ex-Parte Applicants

Reasoning

The judge found that the Taxing Master erred in applying the Advocates Remuneration Order, 2009, and that the proceedings were not heard on merit, leading to an error in principle.

Outcome

The application is granted, and the Taxing Master's decision is set aside. The bill of costs is remitted to another Taxing Master for taxation. Costs are awarded to the Ex-Parte Applicants.

Orders

  • Taxing Master's decision set aside
  • Bill of costs remitted to another Taxing Master
  • Costs awarded to Ex-Parte Applicants

Remedies

  • Remission of bill of costs to another Taxing Master
  • Award of costs to Ex-Parte Applicants

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Advocates (Remuneration) Order, 2009
  • Taxation Ruling
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case