SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wasi v Mosioma (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E14 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 17067 (KLR) (27 April 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 17067 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
17067
Citation
[2023] KEELC 17067 (KLR)
Decided
27 April 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks leave to file an appeal out of time and costs.CoramGMA ONGONDO
The application is allowed, and the applicant is granted leave to file an appeal out of time and costs.

Facts

The applicant, Michael Orinda Wasi, sought an appeal against a judgment dismissing his case and allowing the respondent's counterclaim due to an oversight by his counsel.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause to deserve the orders sought in the application.
  • Whether the application is a sham and should be dismissed with costs.

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time due to a mistake of counsel, and the application has merit.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Leave granted to file an appeal out of time.
  • Costs of the application to abide the prospective appeal.
  • The applicant to lodge the prospective appeal within 21 days from this date.
  • If not done, the orders will lapse automatically.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act Chapter 21 Laws of Kenya
  • Order 50 Rules 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (5)
  • Godfrey Sangura-vs-Jacob Rituyi Muyengani Bungoma HCC Misc. Application 178 of 2002
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat-vs-IEBC and 7 others (2014) eKLR
  • Mugo and others-vs-Wanjiru and another (1970) EA 482
  • Shabir Din-vs-Ram Parkash Anand (1955) EACA Volume 22 page 48
  • Articles 48, 50 (1) and 25 (c) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case