SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rinyuru v Mbui (Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 17759 (KLR) (7 June 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 17759 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
17759
Citation
[2023] KEELC 17759 (KLR)
Decided
7 June 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEnvironment and Land AppealPostureAppeal from a ruling of the Principal Magistrate Court at NkubuCoramCK YANO
Holding

The court issued an order to maintain the status quo and to stay the execution of the ruling made on 3rd August 2022 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The appellant, Jackson Mwiti Rinyuru, filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a ruling by the Principal Magistrate Court at Nkubu, which had dismissed his application for stay of execution pending his appeal. The ruling, if executed, would have evicted Rinyuru and his family from their family land.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has met the threshold for grant of the orders of stay of execution sought

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated his dwelling on the suit property and that the execution of the lower court's order would result in irreparable loss and substantial harm to the applicant. The court also considered the applicant's submission that the appeal raises cogent points of law with a high probability of success.

Outcome

The application was granted.

Orders

  • To maintain the status quo
  • To stay the execution of the ruling made on 3rd August 2022 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Remedies

  • To preserve the applicant's dwelling on the suit property and to prevent eviction

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • HGE v SM
  • Consolidated Marine v Nampija & another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case