SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okonjo (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Michael Okonjo (Deceased) & another v Agola & 6 others (Environment & Land Case E14 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 18259 (KLR) (19 June 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 18259 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
18259
Citation
[2023] KEELC 18259 (KLR)
Decided
19 June 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a preliminary objectionCoramL. A. OMOLLO
The preliminary objection dated July 4, 2022 lacks merit and is hereby dismissed with costs.

Facts

The plaintiffs seek declaratory orders that the registration of the 1st defendant, 2nd defendant, and 3rd defendant as the absolute owner of 33 acres Rongai/Lengenet Block 2/12 Mawe Farm plot No 10024 was fraudulent.

Issues

  • Whether the claim is filed out of time
  • Whether the claim is res judicata
  • Whether the preliminary objection has merit

Reasoning

The court held that issues of limitation of time and res judicata can only be determined at the trial of the main suit and not a preliminary stage.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The 6th and 7th defendants preliminary objection dated July 4, 2022 is dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Sichuan Huashi Enterprises Corp Limited v Micheal Misiko Muhindi
  • Oruta &another v Nyamato
  • Divecon Ltd v Shirinkhanu S. Samani
  • Henry Wanyama Khaemba v Standard Chartered Bank Ltd
  • George Kamau Kimani & 4 others v County Government of Trans-Nzoia
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case