SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Watamu Association (Suing through its elected officials Clare Taylor Bea Anderson & Damian Davies) v Wood & 3 others (Environment & Land Petition 3 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 18807 (KLR) (13 July 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 18807 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
18807
Citation
[2023] KEELC 18807 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPosturePreliminary ObjectionCoramMAO Odeny
Holding

The court has jurisdiction to hear the petition regarding environmental impact and encroachment on riparian land.

Facts

Petitioners claim the land is a riparian zone and construction of a multi-story building is illegal.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the court vs National Environment Tribunal
  2. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) license
  3. Construction legality

Reasoning

The court ruled that the EIA license issue can be appealed to the National Environment Tribunal, but other environmental rights violations are within the court's jurisdiction.

Outcome

Petition granted

Orders

  • Permanent injunction against further construction
  • Demolition of the building
  • Audit of environmental impact
  • Compensation for environmental violation

Remedies

  • Compensation for environmental violation
  • Demolition of the building
  • Audit of environmental impact
  • Permanent injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) 1999
  • National Environment Tribunal Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Republic vs NEMA Ex Parte NEMA
  • Watamu Association (Suing through its elected officials Clare Taylor Bea Anderson & Damian Davies) v Wood & 3 others (Environment & Land Petition 3 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 18807 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case