SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Chairman Ikolomani Division Land Dispute Tribunal; Sahani (Interested Party); Mukalani (Exparte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E004 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 19821 (KLR) (19 September 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELC 19821 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
19821
Citation
[2023] KEELC 19821 (KLR)
Decided
19 September 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte applicant seeks orders of certiorari and mandamusCoramDO OHUNGO
No merit found in the notice of motion, and the application is dismissed with costs to the interested party.

Facts

The ex parte applicant seeks to quash a decision regarding the ownership of LR No. Isukha/Shitochi/3143 land, claiming it was purchased by his late father from the interested party's father. The ex parte applicant also seeks to uphold a decision by the Shinyalu Division Land Dispute Tribunal.

Issues

  • Whether the court has jurisdiction to quash its own judgment through an order of certiorari.
  • Whether the Shinyalu Division Land Dispute Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the title to the registered land.

Reasoning

The court lacks jurisdiction to quash its own judgment through an order of certiorari. The tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine the title to registered land.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act, 1990
  • Halsbury's Laws of England
  • Joseph Malakwen Lelei & another v Rift Valley Land Disputes Appeals Committee & 2 others
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case