Rotich v Keter & another (Environment & Land Case 71 of 2015) [2023] KEELC 20005 (KLR) (25 September 2023) (Ruling)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 20005
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 20005 (KLR)
- Decided
- 25 September 2023
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMotion to Set Aside Ex-Parte JudgmentPostureApplication to set aside ex-parte judgment and stay executionCoramJM ONYANGO
Holding
The ex-parte judgment entered on January 28, 2021 should be set aside as the defendants were not properly served with the originating summons.
Facts
The 2nd defendant/applicant, Robert Kiptum Tuwei, claims he was never served with the originating summons and only learned of the suit when an auctioneer informed him of an arrest warrant. The plaintiff, Isaac Chepkonga Rotich, claims he was served with the summons and that the 2nd defendant was also served.
Issues
- Whether the ex-parte judgment entered on January 28, 2021 should be set aside
- Whether the defendants were properly served with the originating summons
Reasoning
The court found that the defendants were not properly served with the summons, and thus the judgment entered against them was irregular. The court must set aside the default judgment ex debito justitiae.
Outcome
The ex-parte judgment entered on January 28, 2021 is set aside.
Orders
- The ex-parte judgment entered on January 28, 2021 is set aside.
- The application for a stay of execution is dismissed.
Authorities cited
Cases cited (2)
- Mbogo v Shah (1968) EA 93
- James Kanyiita Nderitu & Another v Marios Philotas Ghikas & Another (2016) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…