SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Salim v Ouya (Environment and Land Appeal E106 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 21403 (KLR) (23 October 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 21403 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
21403
Citation
[2023] KEELC 21403 (KLR)
Decided
23 October 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Milimani Chief Magistrate's Civil CourtCoramMOGENI J
The Appellant's application to appeal out of time is dismissed with costs to the Respondent

Facts

The Appellant filed a civil case against the Respondent seeking various orders regarding apartment No. LH12 as a portion of LR 1870/VI/85/IR85012/. The case was dismissed with costs. The Appellant then filed an application for stay, which was later withdrawn. The Appellant subsequently filed an application to appeal out of time, which was also withdrawn. The Appellant then filed a new application to appeal out of time.

Issues

  • Whether the Appellant's application to appeal out of time should be granted
  • Whether the Appellant's application to withdraw the previous application should be allowed

Reasoning

The court found that the Appellant's application to appeal out of time was not timely and granted the Respondent's application to strike out the Appellant's memorandum of appeal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Appellant's Notice of Motion dated 31/08/2023 is dismissed with costs to the Respondent
  • The Respondent's Application dated 19/07/2023 is upheld as prayed
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case