SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sagoo & another v Mesa (Civil Case 71 of 2015) [2023] KEELC 21475 (KLR) (9 November 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 21475 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
21475
Citation
[2023] KEELC 21475 (KLR)
Decided
9 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for reinstatement of dismissed suitCoramOA ANGOTE
Holding

The court allows the application for reinstatement of the plaintiffs' application dated May 23, 2023, finding that the plaintiffs' absence was due to bereavement and technical difficulties, which are excusable.

Facts

The plaintiffs filed a suit on December 30, 2014, and the matter was scheduled for hearing on September 16, 2020. The plaintiffs' counsel was absent on that date, and the court dismissed the suit with costs. The plaintiffs then filed an application for reinstatement on May 23, 2023, which was dismissed. The plaintiffs now seek reinstatement on the grounds of bereavement and technical difficulties.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs have established sufficient cause to warrant reinstatement of the application

Reasoning

The court exercises its discretion to allow the reinstatement of the application, considering the plaintiffs' circumstances as excusable mistakes and not deliberate delays.

Outcome

Application for reinstatement granted

Orders

  • Set aside the dismissal of the plaintiffs' application dated May 23, 2023, and reinstate it for hearing

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Shah v Mbogo & Another (1967) EA 116
  • Richard Ncharpi Leiyagu v Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission & 2 Others [2013] eKLR
  • Philip & Another v Augustine Kibede 1982-88 KLR 103
  • Fran Investment Limited v G4S Security Services Limited (2015) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case