SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Springs Property Management Limited v Mwatsuma & 3 others; Ain Diab Investment Limited (Interested Party) (Land Case 237 of 2014) [2023] KEELC 21689 (KLR) (22 November 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 21689 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
21689
Citation
[2023] KEELC 21689 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand CasePostureAppeal from a negative orderCoramFM NJOROGE, Gikonyo
The court denied the application for a stay of execution, finding that the order was a negative order and not capable of execution, and that the applicant had not shown substantial loss that would be suffered without the stay.

Facts

Springs Property Management Limited filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a court order declaring the boundary between the plaintiff and defendants encroached. The court had previously issued a determination declaring the boundary.

Issues

  • Whether the court should allow the applicant's application seeking to stay negative orders issued in form of a determination by this court.
  • Whether there is sufficient cause for the application to be granted.

Reasoning

The court considered the principles of Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and the case of Masisi Mwita v Damaris Wanjiku Njeri (2016) eKLR, concluding that the declaration of the boundary was not capable of execution and that the applicant had not demonstrated substantial loss.

Outcome

Denied

Orders

  • The application for a stay of execution was denied.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • James Wangalwa & another v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto (2012) eKLR
  • Patrick Ngeta Kimanzi v Marcus Mutua Muluvi & 2 others High Court Election Petition No. 8 of 2013
  • Mohamed Ali Osman T/A Hanan Petroleum v Juanco Group Ltd C.A No. 044 of 2021
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case