SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Toshike Construction Co. Ltd & 5 others v Sokhi & 25 others (Environment & Land Petition E058 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 22047 (KLR) (30 November 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELC 22047 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
22047
Citation
[2023] KEELC 22047 (KLR)
Decided
30 November 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetitionPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramMD MWANGI
The Plaintiffs' suit against the 1st Defendant is hereby struck out with costs.

Facts

The 1st Defendant, Toshike Construction Co. Ltd, applied to strike out the suit against him, claiming he is not the owner of the suit property. The Plaintiffs, Toshike Construction Co. Ltd, argued that the developments on the suit property had not been approved by NEMA and the Nairobi City County Government. The 5th Defendant, Kuku Singh alias Sokhi, had obtained approval and change of user for the suit property.

Issues

  • Ownership of the suit property
  • Approval and change of user for the suit property
  • Public participation in the approval process

Reasoning

The Court found that the 1st Defendant is not the owner of the suit property and that the 5th Defendant, who has obtained approval and change of user for the property, is the rightful owner. The Plaintiffs failed to establish ownership of the suit property prior to filing the case.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs' suit against the 1st Defendant is struck out with costs.

Orders

  • The Plaintiffs' suit against the 1st Defendant is struck out with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Physical and Land Use Planning Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Kibos Distillers Limited & 4 others v Benson Ambuti Adega & 3 others [2020] eKLR
  • Speaker of the National Assembly v James Njenga Karume [1992] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case