SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okero & 2 others v Bichange & another (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 22285 (KLR) (29 November 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELC 22285 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
22285
Citation
[2023] KEELC 22285 (KLR)
Decided
29 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramMUGO KAMAU
Holding

The court declares that the Plaintiffs have acquired title to the land through continuous possession since 1991 and orders the cancellation of the Defendants' title deed and sub-division of the land to create individual title deeds for the Plaintiffs.

Facts

The Plaintiffs claim to have acquired title to land in Isoge Settlement Scheme/199 through continuous possession since 1991. The Defendants deny this and claim the land was registered in their names.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiffs have acquired title to the land through continuous possession
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction and costs

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs have been in continuous possession of the land since 1991, meeting the threshold of adverse possession. The Defendants' title deed is cancelled, and the land is sub-divided to create individual title deeds for the Plaintiffs.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs' claims are upheld, and the Defendants' title deed is cancelled.

Orders

  • Cancellation of the Defendants' title deed in Isoge Settlement Scheme/199
  • Sub-division of the land to create individual title deeds for the Plaintiffs

Remedies

  • Declaration of title acquisition
  • Injunction against further dealings with the land
  • Award of costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case