SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ojwang & 2 others v Onyango (Environment & Land Case 53 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 271 (KLR) (25 January 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELC 271 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
271
Citation
[2024] KEELC 271 (KLR)
Decided
25 January 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramKimaru, Mativo, Nambuye, OA ANGOTE
Holding

The court found in favor of the Plaintiffs, ruling that a verbal tenancy agreement existed and that the Defendant unlawfully evicted the Plaintiffs.

Facts

The Plaintiffs claim a verbal tenancy agreement with the Defendant, and allege unlawful eviction. They deposited a six-month rent of Kshs. 120,000 into the Defendant's deceased father's bank account. The Defendant claims a written tenancy agreement with a monthly rent of Kshs. 30,000.

Issues

  1. Whether there was a tenancy agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant.
  2. Whether the Defendant unlawfully evicted the Plaintiffs.
  3. What remedies the court should issue.

Reasoning

The court ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs, finding that a verbal tenancy agreement existed and that the Defendant unlawfully evicted the Plaintiffs.

Outcome

In favor of the Plaintiffs

Orders

  • An order compelling the Defendant to re-open the suit premises and reinstate the Plaintiffs unconditionally therein, and restraining the Defendant from interfering with the Plaintiffs' quiet enjoyment and trade in the suit premises.
  • Special damages in the total sum of Kshs. 638,000 and Kshs. 5,520,000.
  • General damages for unlawful eviction.
  • Interest on the damages at court rates.

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the Plaintiffs' quiet enjoyment and trade in the suit premises.
  • Special damages of Kshs. 638,000 and Kshs. 5,520,000.
  • General damages for unlawful eviction.
  • Interest on the damages at court rates.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case