SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Oganga v Were (Environment and Land Appeal E010 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3400 (KLR) (25 April 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 3400 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3400
Citation
[2024] KEELC 3400 (KLR)
Decided
25 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppellant seeks leave to adduce additional evidenceCoramAY KOROSS
The court denies the appellant's motion for leave to adduce additional evidence.

Facts

The appellant, John Ojwang’ Oganga, seeks leave to file additional evidence on appeal, including his primary school certificate and birth certificate, which he claims were misplaced and could not be produced before the trial court.

Issues

  • Whether the appellant should be granted leave to adduce additional evidence

Reasoning

The court finds that the appellant has not shown that the additional evidence is pertinent to the just determination of the dispute and that the respondent is not prejudiced.

Outcome

The motion is denied.

Orders

  • The court denies the appellant's motion for leave to adduce additional evidence.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case