SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nur & 3 others v Tahir Sheikh Said Investments Limited; Shami Motors Limited (Interested Party) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 162 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 3712 (KLR) (23 April 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 3712 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3712
Citation
[2024] KEELC 3712 (KLR)
Decided
23 April 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEnvironmental and Land Originating SummonsPostureApplication for stay of proceedingsCoramNA MATHEKA, YANO
The suit is stayed pending the hearing of Mombasa ELC No. E049 of 2023.

Facts

The Plaintiffs claim adverse possession over Plot No. 154 Section XXI Mombasa Island, which is charged to Bank of Africa Limited. The Defendant seeks to nullify the sale of the property to the Interested Party. A previous suit (Mombasa HCC No. 57 of 2016) was filed by the Defendant challenging Bank of Africa's right to sell and the Interested Party's right to acquire the property. The Interested Party opposed the injunction.

Issues

  • Whether the proceedings of this suit can be stayed?
  • Whether the sale of the property was lawful and title has lawfully passed to the Interested Party?

Reasoning

The court finds that there is a risk of conflicting decisions if this suit is heard before the suit filed by the Interested Party. The court grants a stay of proceedings.

Outcome

The suit is stayed pending the hearing of Mombasa ELC No. E049 of 2023.

Orders

  • This suit be stayed pending the hearing and determination of Mombasa ELC No. E049 of 2023.
  • The costs of this application be in the cause.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Banking Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Henderson vs Henderson (1843-60) ALL E.R 378
  • Harman Singh & Others vs Mistri (1971) EA 122
  • Jadva Karsan vs Harnam Singh Bhogal (1953) 20 (1) EACA 74
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case