SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sagalla Ranchers Limited v Makalo & 97 others (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3872 (KLR) (Environment and Land) (16 May 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 3872 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3872
Citation
[2024] KEELC 3872 (KLR)
Decided
16 May 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeBoundary DisputePostureApplication for Temporary Injunction DismissedCoramEK WABWOTO
The court lacks jurisdiction to hear the suit due to the alternative remedy provided by the Land Registration Act and the Plainti has not established exceptional circumstances.

Facts

Sagalla Ranchers Limited claims that Amos Makalo and 97 others illegally trespassed on their land (L.R No. 12277/8 and L.R No. 12277/9) and engaged in illegal activities.

Issues

  • Whether the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the suit by dint of Section 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act No. 3 of 2012.
  • If the answer to the above is negative, whether the Plainti has made a case for grant of the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The court found that the Plainti has not demonstrated that the Defendants are engaging in illegal activities and thus, no prima facie case has been established.

Outcome

The Plainti's application for temporary injunction is dismissed.

Orders

  • The application dated 13th December 2023 is hereby dismissed.
  • The Preliminary Objection dated 17th January 2024 is unmerited and is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Land Registration Act No. 3 of 2012
  • Oraro v Mbaja (2005) I KLR
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd (1973) E.A 358
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others (2014) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case