SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ochieng & another v Mansa East Africa Limited (Miscellaneous Application E074 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 389 (KLR) (31 January 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELC 389 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
389
Citation
[2024] KEELC 389 (KLR)
Decided
31 January 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for orders to adopt a certificate of costs and grant interest and costsCoramJA MOGENI, KLR Lenaola, MOGENI
Holding

The court finds the application merited and enters judgment for the advocate in terms of the certificate of costs dated 26/09/2022.

Facts

The applicants appealed a judgment from the National Environment Tribunal (NET) and subsequently filed a bill of costs. The National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) and the respondent were ordered to pay the taxed costs of Kshs. 3,026,210.

Issues

  1. Whether the court can enter judgment for the taxed costs in the absence of a suit for judgment on the certificate of costs.
  2. Whether the respondent's appeal precludes the court from proceeding with the application for adoption of the certificate of costs and granting interest and costs.

Reasoning

The court held that once costs are taxed, the advocate should follow through on the steps provided to institute a suit for recovery of costs and obtain a judgment and decree capable of being executed. The court also noted that the respondent had not set aside or altered the certificate of costs and had not consolidated the application with his appeal.

Outcome

Judgment for the advocate in terms of the certificate of costs dated 26/09/2022.

Orders

  • Judgment for the advocate in terms of the certificate of costs dated 26/09/2022.
  • No order as to costs.

Remedies

  • Judgment for the taxed costs of Kshs. 3,026,210.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Advocates Act Cap 16 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • L.N. Ngolya and Company Advocates vs Jackson Mithi Kilango (2008) eKLR
  • Musyoka &Wambua Advocates v RustamHira Advocate (2006) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case