Pamba & 2 others v Barasa & 3 others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2020 & Environment & Land Case 111 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 3909 (KLR) (24 April 2024) (Judgment)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 3909
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 3909 (KLR)
- Decided
- 24 April 2024
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial judgmentCoramBN OLAO, Omollo
Holding
The court held that Barasa and Asiepet are the registered proprietors of the land parcels and Pamba's claim of adverse possession is not valid.
Facts
Pamba claims adverse possession of a portion of land, while Barasa and Asiepet claim to be the registered proprietors of the land parcels inherited from their deceased father.
Issues
- Whether Pamba was in open and continuous possession of the land
Reasoning
The court found that Barasa and Asiepet are the registered proprietors due to their inheritance from their deceased father and the issuance of a confirmed grant.
Outcome
Pamba's claim of adverse possession is dismissed.
Orders
- The court confirmed the registered proprietors of the land parcels as Barasa and Asiepet.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…