SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyongesa t/a Nyongesa & Co Advocates v Moorgate Investment Limited (Miscellaneous Application E002 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 4005 (KLR) (25 April 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 4005 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4005
Citation
[2024] KEELC 4005 (KLR)
Decided
25 April 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks to adopt a Certificate of costs as judgment and decree; Respondent seeks to stay the adoption and cross-examine the applicantCoramEK MAKORI
Holding

The application to adopt the Certificate of costs as judgment and decree is allowed, with interest from 11th January 2023 at 14% per annum and costs awarded to the applicant. The application to stay the adoption is dismissed.

Facts

The applicant acted as advocate for the respondent in a previous case, but was later removed and instructed another advocate. The applicant filed a bill of costs, which was taxed at Kshs. 970.173.90. The respondent disputes the client-advocate relationship and the service of the bill.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application to adopt the Certificate of costs as judgment and decree should be allowed
  2. Whether the respondent's application to stay the adoption and cross-examine the applicant should be granted

Reasoning

The court ruled that once the taxing master taxed the costs and issued a Certificate of costs, no further action was required from the court, and the applicant is not required to file suit for the recovery of costs.

Outcome

The application to adopt the Certificate of costs as judgment and decree is allowed.

Orders

  • The application to adopt the Certificate of costs as judgment and decree is allowed.
  • The application to stay the adoption and cross-examine the applicant is dismissed.

Remedies

  • Interest on the taxed sum from 11th January 2023 at 14% per annum
  • Award of costs to the applicant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case