SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Odula v Wosianju (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 7 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 4455 (KLR) (23 May 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELC 4455 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4455
Citation
[2024] KEELC 4455 (KLR)
Decided
23 May 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramEC CHERONO
Holding

The court found that the applicant has acquired title to the land by adverse possession and the respondent will bear the costs of the suit.

Facts

The applicant, Fredric Gigwa Odiulla, claims adverse possession of 2 acres of land in suit land LR No. Bungoma/Kiminini/1, which he alleges his deceased father purchased from the respondent in 1996. The respondent, Titus Wanyonyi Wosianju, claims he was the original owner and was registered as proprietor in 2002.

Issues

  1. whether the applicant has acquired title to a portion of two (2) acres comprised in the suit land by way of adverse possession
  2. who will bear the Costs of this suit

Reasoning

The court applied the principles of adverse possession under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, finding that the applicant's father had possession of the land for 12 years, which is the statutory period for adverse possession.

Outcome

The applicant's claim for adverse possession is upheld, and the respondent is ordered to bear the costs of the suit.

Orders

  • The applicant is registered as the proprietor of the land

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22
  • Land Act, 2012
  • Land Registration Act, 2012
Cases cited (1)
  • Jandu vs Kirpal& Another [1975] EA 225
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case