SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v National Land Commission & another; County Government of Kiambu (Proposed Interested Party); Mihiu (Exparte Applicant) (Miscellaneous Application 11 of 2017) [2024] KEELC 5014 (KLR) (25 June 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 5014 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
5014
Citation
[2024] KEELC 5014 (KLR)
Decided
25 June 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramBM EBOSO
Holding

The County Government of Kiambu is joined as a 3rd respondent, the previous judgment is set aside, and the cause is heard afresh.

Facts

The ex-parte applicant sought an order of certiorari quashing the decision of the National Land Commission, which recommended revoking the applicant's title to land parcel Ruiru Township/20 and vested it in the County Government of Kiambu.

Issues

  1. Whether the County Government of Kiambu was a necessary party in the judicial review proceedings
  2. Whether the previous judgment should be set aside due to the post-judgment joinder of the County Government of Kiambu

Reasoning

The County Government of Kiambu was a necessary party due to the decision that vested the land in them. The previous judgment should be set aside as the County Government of Kiambu was not a party in the original proceedings.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • County Government of Kiambu joined as a 3rd respondent
  • Previous judgment set aside
  • Cause heard afresh
  • County Government of Kiambu granted 14 days to respond to the judicial review motion
  • Costs in the cause

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Article 68(c)(v) of the Constitution
  • National Land Commission Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case