Taiko & another v District Land Registrar, Kajiado & 3 others (Miscellaneous Civil Application E015 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5353 (KLR) (11 July 2024) (Judgment)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 5353
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 5353 (KLR)
- Decided
- 11 July 2024
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamusCoramLC KOMINGOI
Holding
The Applicants are not entitled to the reliefs sought.
Facts
The Applicants sought a judicial review of the District Land Registrar's ruling on boundary disputes between their land and others. The Registrar's ruling was based on a surveyor's report dated 8th August 2023.
Issues
- Whether the Applicants are entitled to the reliefs sought?
- Who should bear costs?
Reasoning
The Applicants were informed of the hearing and did not contest being present. The surveyor's report was based on the presence of the land owners and their testimony, which the Applicants did not contest.
Outcome
The application was dismissed.
Authorities cited
Legislation (1)
- Land Registration Act
Cases cited (1)
- Municipal Council of Mombasa v Republic & another [2002] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…