SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Waita v David & another (Environment and Land Appeal 10 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 6070 (KLR) (18 September 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 6070 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
6070
Citation
[2024] KEELC 6070 (KLR)
Decided
18 September 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppellant seeks a temporary injunctionCoramTW MURIGI
A temporary injunction is granted against the Respondents to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

Matha Mwelu Waita claims to be the beneficial owner of Plot No. 1324 at Kiu Settlement Scheme No. 7, and alleges that Respondents have trespassed, destroyed her property, subdivided the land, and offered it for sale to third parties.

Issues

  • Whether the Applicant has met the threshold for grant of a temporary injunction pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  • Whether the application is devoid of merit and ought to be dismissed

Reasoning

The court considers the principles for the grant of a temporary injunction pending appeal and finds that the Applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Orders

  • A temporary injunction do issue against the Respondents to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Remedies

  • Maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Order 40 Rules 1 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules
  • Sections 1A and 3A of the Civil Procedure Code
  • Order 42 Rule 6(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules
  • Patricia Njeri & 3 Others v National Museum of Kenya [2004] eKLR
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd [1973] EA 358
Cases cited (1)
  • Mrao Limited v First American Bank of Kenya & 2 Others [2003] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case