SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okina v Mele & 2 others (Environment & Land Petition E001 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 6157 (KLR) (Environment and Land) (26 September 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELC 6157 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
6157
Citation
[2024] KEELC 6157 (KLR)
Decided
26 September 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEnvironmental PetitionPosturePetition for Declaration and InjunctionCoramEK WABWOTO
Holding

A declaration that the Respondents' spray painting activities are a violation of the Petitioner's right to a clean and healthy environment, a permanent injunction against the Respondents, and general damages of Kshs 150,000 awarded to the Petitioner.

Facts

Maurice Otieno Okina, the Petitioner, claimed that Munga Kombo Mele and Patrick Meso, the Respondents, were spray painting motor vehicles near his residential home, causing him health issues and hindering his studies.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petitioner has discharged the burden of proof that his right to a clean and healthy environment has been violated.
  2. What the appropriate reliefs that ought to be granted.

Reasoning

The court found that the Petitioner adduced evidence confirming the Respondents' impugned activities and the adverse effects on his health. The court also noted the Respondents' failure to contest the existence of their activities and the violation of the Petitioner's right to a clean and healthy environment.

Outcome

In favor of the Petitioner

Orders

  • A declaration of violation of the Petitioner's right to a clean and healthy environment.
  • A permanent injunction against the Respondents.
  • General damages of Kshs 150,000 awarded to the Petitioner.

Remedies

  • Declaration of violation.
  • Permanent injunction.
  • General damages.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Article 42 of the Constitution
  • Article 69 of the Constitution
  • Article 70 of the Constitution
Cases cited (1)
  • Leonard Otieno v Airtel Kenya Ltd (2018) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case