SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Opanda v Ondachi (Environment & Land Case 5 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 6622 (KLR) (9 October 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELC 6622 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
6622
Citation
[2024] KEELC 6622 (KLR)
Decided
9 October 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand Ownership DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramE ASATI
The court finds that the applicant has demonstrated peaceful, continuous occupation and use of the land for more than 12 years with the knowledge of the respondent. The applicant has also acquired the whole of the land by adverse possession.

Facts

Josephat Akhanya Opanda claimed adverse possession over land parcel E/Bunyore/Ebusamia/269, measuring 0.32 hectares, since 1984. The land was previously owned by Josephat Ondachi Bunyali, who died and was substituted by his son Josephat Ondachi. The case was pending for over a decade.

Issues

  • whether the applicant has been in peaceful, continuous occupation and use of the land for more than 12 years with the respondent's knowledge
  • whether the applicant has acquired the whole of the land by adverse possession

Reasoning

The court considered the evidence and found that the applicant's presence on the land was peaceful and continuous, and the respondent had knowledge of it. The court also noted that the applicant had established his home on the land and used it for cultivation.

Outcome

The court dismissed the respondent's preliminary objection and ordered the respondent's name to be cancelled from the register and the land to be registered in the applicant's name.

Orders

  • The respondent's name to be cancelled from the register and the land to be registered in the applicant's name

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22 of the Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Gabriel Mbui vs Mukinda Maranya (19193)eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case