SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Solomon v Solomon & 3 others (Environment and Land Appeal E011 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 7038 (KLR) (23 October 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEELC 7038 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
7038
Citation
[2024] KEELC 7038 (KLR)
Decided
23 October 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a motion for stay of executionCoramKANIARU
The court grants a stay of execution pending the hearing of the appeal, allowing the appellant to present his case and avoid the risk of his appeal being rendered nugatory.

Facts

The appellant, Evanson Nyaga Solomon, filed an appeal against a judgment in Runyenjes ELC No. 19 of 2018, which ordered the subdivision of his land parcel No. Kyeni/Mufu/717. The respondents, Bedan Njeru Solomon, Jefitha Njeru Solomon, Enosh Njeru Solomon, and Margaret Wanjagi Solomon, invaded the land and caused damage. The appellant fears his appeal will be rendered nugatory without the stay.

Issues

  • Whether the court should grant a stay of execution pending the hearing of the appeal
  • Whether the appellant has provided sufficient security for the stay

Reasoning

The court finds that the appellant is entitled to a stay of execution due to the substantial risk of irreparable damage to his appeal if the stay is not granted, and that the application was not made with unreasonable delay.

Outcome

The court grants the stay of execution.

Orders

  • Stay of execution pending the hearing of the appeal
  • Appellant to provide security as the court may direct

Remedies

  • Stay of execution pending appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • Peter Nakupang Lowar v Nautu Lowar (2022) Eklr
  • Halal & Another v Thornton & Turpin (1963) Ltd (1990) Eklr
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case