Nothern Block Residents Limited & another v National Environment Management Authority & 2 others (Environment and Planning Judicial Review E001 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 7196 (KLR) (17 October 2024) (Judgment)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 7196
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 7196 (KLR)
- Decided
- 17 October 2024
Summary at a glance
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for certiorari and prohibitionCoramAA OMOLLO
The court finds that the development approvals and environmental impact assessment license were issued in violation of public participation requirements and other statutory provisions.
Facts
The applicants seek to quash environmental impact assessment licenses and approvals issued by the National Environment Management Authority to Makanjawa Company Limited for a change of user and development on a residential plot in Nairobi.
Issues
- Non-compliance with public participation requirements in environmental impact assessments and development approvals
- Irregularity in the issuance of the environmental impact assessment license and change of use approval
Reasoning
The court upholds the applicants' arguments that the development approvals and environmental impact assessment license were issued without adequate public participation, in violation of constitutional and statutory requirements.
Outcome
The court quashes the environmental impact assessment license and the development approvals.
Orders
- An order of certiorari to remove into the court and quash the Environmental Impact License No. NEMA/EIA/PSL/24714
- An order of certiorari to remove into the court and quash the Environmental Impact Assessment Report
- An order of certiorari to remove into the court and quash the Notication of approval
- A declaration that the third respondent’s Environmental Impact Assessment License violates constitutional and statutory provisions
Remedies
- Quashing of the environmental impact assessment license and development approvals
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…