SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v District Commissioner, Narok North; Nkuruma (Suing as an administrator of the Estate of the Late Sironka Ole Nturere) (Exparte Applicant); Kumomali (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 91 (KLR) (24 January 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEELC 91 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
91
Citation
[2024] KEELC 91 (KLR)
Decided
24 January 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx Parte Application for Certiorari, Mandamus, and ProhibitionCoramCG MBOGO
Holding

The Ex-Parte Applicant's application for Judicial Review Orders of Certiorari is dismissed with costs to the Interested Party.

Facts

The Ex-Parte Applicant filed an objection against the Interested Party regarding plot no. 331 in Narok North. The objection was conducted with full participation of all parties, and a verdict was rendered on 17th February, 2009. The Interested Party was given 60 days to appeal, but the Ex-Parte Applicant did not hear from the matter thereafter.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent exceeded the power to make the orders.
  2. Whether the orders sought of judicial review are available.

Reasoning

The Ex-Parte Applicant failed to appear before the respondent despite summons being served upon him. The court found that the Ex-Parte Applicant did not rebut the claims raised through affidavits and thus did not establish grounds for the judicial review orders.

Outcome

The Ex-Parte Applicant's application is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Chief Constable of the North Wales Police v Evans
  • Republic v Director of Immigration Services
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case